Investing Lessons: Avoiding the Peter Lynch Bias

The single most important lesson I’ve learned about being a successful investor is the need to maintain emotional detachment.  Any feelings you may have towards a stock are unrequited.  If you love a stock, it will not love you back.  And if you hate a stock, it will not give you the satisfaction of responding in kind.  (As tragic as unanswered love may be, unanswered hate is often more damaging to your pride.)

A stock is like that unattainable cheerleader you had a crush on in high school.  She neither loved you nor hated you; she was completely unaware you existed.

No matter how much you love a stock (and write favorably about it in MarketWatch) it will not reward your loyalty by rising in price. And heaven help you if you allow your emotions to cloud your judgment in a short position.  I know of no surer way of losing your investment nest egg than to short a stock or other investment you hate.  Alas, I know from experience; I shorted the Nasdaq 100 in the fall of 2003.  In an outbreak of moral high-horsing that has (thankfully) now been purged out of me, I decided that tech stocks were overpriced and needed to fall further.  The Nasdaq had very different ideas, and I was forced to cover that short at a 20% loss with my tail tucked between my legs.

A closely-related investment mistake is succumbing to what I call the “Peter Lynch bias.”

Peter Lynch ran the Fidelity Magellan fund from 1977 to 1990 and had one of the best performance records in history for a mutual fund manager—an annualized return of over 29% per year.

Unfortunately, he also offered some of the worst advice in history when he recommended that investors “invest in what they know.”

On the surface, it seems like decent enough advice.  If you stumble across a product you like—say, a particular brand of mobile phone or a new restaurant chain—then it might be reasonable to assume that others will feel the same way.  If the stock is reasonably priced, it might make a good investment opportunity.

Unfortunately, “investing in what you know” tends to create muddled, emotionally baggaged thinking.  The fact that you like Chipotle (NYSE:$CMG) burritos and are intimately aware of every ingredient used in the red salsa does not automatically make Chipotle a good investment any more than your liking of Frappuccino makes Starbucks (Nasdaq:$SBUX) a good investment.   Rather than give you an insightful edge, liking the product causes you to lose perspective and see only what you want to see in the stock.

How do we mitigate our emotional impulses?

In a prior article, I noted that “brain damage can create superior investment results.”  But short of physically re-wiring our brains, what can we actually do?

I try to follow these basic guidelines and recommend them:

  • If you like a company’s products, try using one of their competitors before seriously considering purchasing the stock.  If I had really taken the time to learn how to use an Apple (Nasdaq:$AAPL) iPhone or Google (Nasdaq:$GOOG) Android device, I probably wouldn’t have gotten sucked into the Research in Motion (Nasdaq:$RIMM) value trap. Yes, RIMM was one of the cheapest stock in the world when I recommended it last year.  But I cannot deny that my decision to recommend it was biased by my ownership of a BlackBerry phone.  Likewise, many iPhone owners are probably buying Apple for similar reasons today.
  • To the best extent you can, try to follow trading rules and use stop losses.  What works for one investor will be very different than what works for another.  Perhaps you use a hard stop loss of, say, 10% below your purchase price.  Or perhaps you use a trailing stop or 20-25%.  If you are a value investor, perhaps you base your sell decision on valuation or fundamentals rather than market price.  But in any event, my point stands.  Lay out the conditions under which you intend to sell and stick to them.  Stock ownership is a marriage of convenience with quick, no-fault divorce if your situation changes.  Don’t make the mistake of falling in love.
  • Unleash your inner Spock.  For readers who are not Star Trek fans, Spock is an alien from the planet Vulcan who is incapable of feeling emotions.  When talking about a stock or watching its price fluctuate gets your heart racing, take a step back and try to look at the investment through Spock’s eyes.  Is it logical?  Do the numbers make sense?  Are the growth projections based on reasonable facts or on optimistic hope?  Would you buy a different company if it were trading at the same price multiple?

Admittedly, these are not precise guidelines.  But then, another lesson I learned is that it is a mistake to try to be too precise in this business.  Follow the lead of great value investors like Benjamin Graham and Warren Buffett by making sure you have a wide margin of safety in your assumptions.

Disclosures: Charles Sizemore has no positions in any securities mentioned. This article first appeared on MarketWatch.

Charles Lewis Sizemore, CFA, is chief investment officer of the investment firm Sizemore Capital Management and the author of the Sizemore Insights blog.

Embrace Your Inner Spock: Three Questions Investors Should be Asking

Congratulations, you’ve just lived through the sixth-worst day in the history of the U.S. stock market. The Dow Industrials fell 634 points on Monday in response to Standard & Poor’s downgrade of the United States’ credit rating, and two days later the volatility continues.

After a day like that, it’s important to step back and get a little perspective. When you see the world around you crashing down, it’s natural to panic. But ask yourself the following questions:

  1. If the United States is now a bad credit, then why did bond investors run to Treasuries as the market was selling off? The yield on the 10-year Treasury note is now near all-time lows. This suggests that bond holders are not the least bit worried about getting their money back. If bond investors aren’t worried, then why are you?
  2. Why is it that Warren Buffett — the most successful investor in history — brushed off the S&P debt announcement and considers stocks to be attractively priced?
  3. And how are stocks “risky” when some of the biggest and most widely-held names — such as Sizemore Investment Letter recommendations Intel (INTC), Microsoft (MSFT), Johnson & Johnson (JNJ), Procter & Gamble (PG), Altria (MO), Philip Morris International (PM), Diageo (DEO), and Unilever (UL), to name a few — now pay out more in dividend yield than the 10-year Treasury does in interest?

When you do your homework and you choose your investments well, you don’t have to worry at times like these. In fact, if you have extra cash at your disposal, you use them as a buying opportunity. That’s what the all-time great investors do.

Long-time readers have no doubt heard me mention the name Albert Meyer, who manages the Mirzam Capital Appreciation Fund (MIRZX). I consider him one of the sharpest accounting minds in the business. I’m also not entirely convinced that he’s human; I suspect that he is a refugee from planet Vulcan, home of Star Trek’s Spock.

Meyer has that certain personality quirk that tends to be prevalent in successful value investors: A total lack of emotion when it comes to the investment process. He dissects a company’s financial statements with the detachment of a surgeon in the operating room. When he determines that a company is a bargain, he buys it; if he determines that a company is expensive, or if he finds its accounting practices questionable, he avoids it, no matter how popular it is.

He also has a second personality quirk that is common to virtually all successful value investors: An ability to tune out the constant stream of noise coming from the media. Meyer, like me, reads the Financial Times religiously. But unlike me, who compulsively has to read it every morning with my coffee, Meyer reads a weeks’ worth of newspapers at once, usually on a Saturday when the market is closed. Oh, and he doesn’t own a TV. (“It’s mostly all rubbish, anyway,” is his rationale, spoken in his professorial South African accent. He’s correct on that count.)

Right now, I’m going to recommend that we play it cool like Meyer. If you are comfortable with what you own — and I most certainly am — then don’t let a wave of hysteria over a meaningless credit downgrade cloud your judgment. You sell when your reasons for owning an investment no longer hold true, not because of a volatile fear-based decline. Continue to collect the dividend checks and add to your positions as your funds allow. You’ll sleep better at night. And when the dust settles, you’re likely to walk away from all of this a lot richer.

Charles Lewis Sizemore, CFA

Sizemore Insights is a free service of Sizemore Financial Publishing LLC, publisher of The Sizemore Investment Letter, a monthly subscriber-only newsletter.

SUBSCRIBE TODAY to Sizemore Insights and get access to information that is simply not available anywhere else.