Microsoft Buying LinkedIn: $26 Billion Down the Tubes?

I gave my thoughts to CNBC’s Martin Soong on click here Microsoft’s (MSFT) $26 billion takeover of order cialis online cheap LinkedIn (LNKD).

While I am a long-time Microsoft bull, the company has a terrible track record on acquisitions, including the $7 billion purchase of Nokia in 2013 (which was effectively written down to zero), the $6 billion purchase of online advertiser Aquantive in 2007 (which was also effectively written down to zero) and the $2.5 billion purchase of Minecraft maker Mojang in 2014. While Minecraft might actually be profitable for Microsoft, it was still a strange acquisition that didn’t seem to make much strategic sense at the time… and still doesn’t.

And of course, the largest acquisition prior to the recently announced LinkedIn purchase was the $8.5 billion Microsoft paid for Skype in 2011. I love Skype and use it almost daily. But as much as I like both Skype and Microsoft, I don’t see that Microsoft has done much to monetize Skype or even to push for its wider acceptance. In a world in which new messaging and voice apps pop up every other day, Skype seems to be withering on the vine.

So Microsoft’s track record on acquisitions has been just about awful. But will the $26 billion purchase of LinkedIn be any different?

Let’s consider the numbers. LinkedIn seems to have the same fundamental issue that every other social media company other than Facebook (FB) does. It doesn’t have much of a business model. It’s lost money in six of the past eight quarters and shows no sign of breaking that streak any time soon. Some of this is growing pains; the company has more than doubled its revenues since 2013. But that’s still a long string of losses for a company LinkedIn’s age.

Yet despite the earnings disappointments, the stock still isn’t cheap. It trades for 8 times sales. Given Microsoft’s track record with acquisitions, it’s hard to see even the most optimistic scenario justifying that kind of a valuation.

Satya Nadella has done a fine job of rebuilding Microsoft as a cloud-focused business services company, and perhaps this is part of some greater plan. Microsoft has specifically mentioned data mining LinkedIn’s vast mountains of data as a major selling point. But Microsoft’s biggest problem in its acquisitions has bee its inability to integrate them well (see Skype as an example).

All in all, I’d consider this a bad trade for Microsoft. With over $100 billion in cash, Microsoft can make the occasional extravagant purchase like this without a lot of consequences. Though it is worth noting that Moody’s did put MSFT’s AAA credit rating under review in response.

Disclosures: Long Microsoft

Charles Lewis Sizemore, CFA is the principal of Sizemore Capital, an investments firm in Dallas, Texas.

click here Disclaimer: This material is provided for informational purposes only, as of the date hereof, and is subject to change without notice. This material may not be suitable for all investors and is not intended to be an offer, or the solicitation of any offer, to buy or sell any securities nor is it intended to be investment advice. You should speak to a financial advisor before attempting to implement any of the strategies discussed in this material. There is risk in any investment in traded securities, and all investment strategies discussed in this material have the possibility of loss. Past performance is no guarantee of future results. The author of the material or a related party will often have an interest in the securities discussed. Please see Full Disclaimer for a full disclaimer.