Archive | World

RSS feed for this section

The Cyprus Crisis and What It Means For Investors

I’ll give the European Union credit: at least they are creative at finding new ways to upset the world’s capital markets.

Instead of demanding just the usual austerity measures of higher taxes and lower spending—and a potential haircut on speculative creditors such as hedge funds—the EU bailout negotiators insisted over the weekend on extracting a pound of flesh from the customers of Cypriot banks.  Savers would see as much as 10% of their checking and savings accounts expropriated to help cover the cost of the bailout, and the levy would apply even to accounts insured by the Cypriot equivalent of the FDIC.

Ouch.

Needless to say, the news didn’t go over well in Cyprus; it led to a small-scale bank run as depositors rushed to get to their cash.  It also didn’t go over particularly well in Russia.  Cyprus is notorious as a haven for Russian funds of…ahem…questionable origins.  Roughly a quarter of all Cypriot bank deposits are owned by Russians.

As I’m writing this, it looked likely that Cyprus’ parliament would shoot down the bailout agreement hammered out between the government and the European Union on the grounds that it wasn’t fair to small local savers who assumed their deposits were protected by government guarantee. (Imagine any democrat or republican approving something like that here; it would be political suicide.)  The government is also reluctant to “soak the Russians” out of fear that it will destroy confidence so badly as to end Cyprus’ existence as an offshore financial center.  And I can’t say I blame them for not wanting to anger the Russian mafia dons or Russian President Vladimir Putin.  That’s not good for your health.

So what happens now?

Good question. My best guess is that the deal is slightly tweaked to allow the Cypriot government to save face but that the bailout goes through and the depositors get hit.  Politically, German Chancellor Angela Merkel and French President Francois Hollande cannot ask their taxpayers to come to the rescue of dirty Russian money, nor should they.

If the bailout flops, the options quickly get messy.  I don’t see the EU backing down this time and watering down the deal, nor do I see the European Central Bank continuing to provide emergency liquidity.  This means that without the bailout, the Cypriot banking system will collapse, and given that the banking system is eight times larger than the economy, there is no way that Cyprus will be able to make its depositors whole.  Barring some sort of last-minute emergency loan from Russia (which would presumably come with some pretty wicked strings attached), Cyprus either accepts the EU bailout and goes about its business or it drops the euro, issues a new currency, and then falls into hyperinflationary oblivion.

What does this mean for the Eurozone?

The fear was that seizing bank deposits would set a terrible precedent and lead to bank runs in Spain, Italy and other indebted countries and plunge us back into crisis mode.  Once bank depositors are seen as a viable target, you create a slippery slope.

But judging by the market’s reaction, this is a non-event.  European stocks took a small hit on the news, though it caused nothing like the turmoil over Greece, Spain and Italy last year.  Bond yields in these problem countries spiked up but hardly to levels that would cause alarm.

There are a couple reasons why the bank run didn’t happen…or at least hasn’t happened yet.  To start, Spain and Italy already effectively had bank runs last year.  Funds have been leaking out of both since the onset of the crisis, and their respective banking systems have been kept solvent by the ECB.  But more basically, it’s an open secret that Cyprus is a haven for dirty money (wink wink), and investors see clear differences between their own banking systems and that of Cyprus.

There is also the “Draghi Put,” or the belief that ECB President Mario Draghi will live up to his word to do “whatever it takes” to keep the euro intact.  This, more than anything, has been what has stabilized the Eurozone over the past nine months.

And finally, don’t underestimate the effects of “crisis fatigue.”  After three years of crisis, these sorts of headlines simply don’t have the ability to move the market like they used to.

Things could still get very ugly very fast in Europe if the feared contagion finally does happen.  But for now, it looks as though this too shall pass.

Cyprus may choose to leave the Eurozone before this is over or may well become a Russian client state; anything is possible at this point.  But I don’t see any of these outcomes changing the direction of events.  The Eurozone will undergo deeper integration.   With or without Cyprus, the rest of the Eurozone will sink or swim together.

This makes things a little awkward for non-Eurozone EU members like the UK, Sweden and Demark.  But even as the cumbersome, confusing mess it is, the Eurozone will muddle through.

How are we to invest in this environment?  I would recommend using any sell-offs to accumulate shares of some of Europe’s finest companies.  One in particular I like at current prices is Spanish telecom giant Telefonica (NYSE:$TEF).  Telefonica is quietly paying down its debts, and I expect the company to reinstate its dividend within the next 1-2 years.  In the meantime, it’s an excellent way to get exposure to the growing markets of Latin America, where it gets more than half its revenues.

SUBSCRIBE to Sizemore Insights via e-mail today.

Disclosures: Sizemore Capital is long TEF.

Comments { 1 }

Investing in Oz

In the world of finance, “Investing in Oz” is usually taken to mean investing in Australia.  But with the recent interest in the 1939 classic movie The Wizard of Oz, the phrase has taken on a whole new meaning.

In 2013, Oz is back in a big way.  Walt Disney Pictures, a division of the Walt Disney Company (NYSE:$DIS), is set to release Oz the Great and Powerful early next month.  The movie—which had a $200 million budget—is a prequel to the original Wizard of Oz and tells the story of how the Wizard, played by James Franco, originally got to Oz.  The Wicked Witches of the East and West are, respectively, played by Rachel Weisz and Mila Kunis.

But the Disney production is not the only game in town.  Summertime Entertainment, which is privately held, is producing a $60 million animated telling of the Oz story with the working title Dorothy of Oz.

Dorothy

Dorothy Gale, voiced by Lea Michele

While the live-action Disney movie is getting more attention at the moment due to its imminent release, Dorothy of Oz may end up being the larger money maker.

The producers put together a cast that includes Glee star Lea Michele as Dorothy, Dan Aykroyd as the Scarecrow, Kelsey Grammer as the Tin Man and Jim Belushi as the Lion.

Smash’s Megan Hilty plays the China Princess, a new character not seen in the original Wizard of Oz, and Martin Short, Oliver Platt and Patrick Stewart also have prominent roles as new characters.  Much of the soundtrack is being recorded by singer-songwriter Bryan Adams.

Paying actors to voice an animated character is cheaper and more time efficient than paying them to stand in front of a camera.  But apart from having a production budget that is one fourth the size of Oz the Great and Powerful—and thus a much lower threshold for profitability—Dorothy of Oz could easily end up out-grossing its live-action rival.  Animated movies perform almost unbelievably well at the box office.

As NPR reported last year, there have been 70 computer-animated movies produced since the launch of Toy Story in 1995, and virtually all of them have grossed more than $100 million at the box office.  Animated films are also uniquely well suited for sequels, which often perform better than the originals.  And Dorothy, by the way, is the first of a three-part trilogy.

To throw out a few examples you might recognize, the Shrek franchise has taken in more than $3.5 billion, the Ice Age franchise $2.8 billion and the Toy Story and Madagascar franchises $1.9 billion each.

To put this in perspective, the entire Star Wars franchise, spanning six major movies over 35 years, has grossed only $4.3 billion.  The James Bond franchise, which has spanned 23 films over 50 years and six actors playing the starring role, has grossed $6.1 billion.

The children’s movie industry also has excellent demographics in front of it.  2007 was the largest birth year in U.S. history, even larger than the years of the post-World-War-II baby boom.  Those children born in 2007 are now 5-6 years old and finally old enough to sit through a movie.  They are also plenty old enough to nag their parents to take them.

But this is just the tip of the iceberg in the business of animation.  Though shrinking due to piracy and streaming services, DVD sales generally make up a large percentage of the total gross for a movie studio, and animated films tend to do particularly well in this area.  Revenues from DVD sales are often higher than revenues from the box office for animated movies.  Kids often re-watch their favorite movies multiple times per day, and a $15 DVD is often the cheapest babysitter a parent will find for their kids.

And this is nothing compared to merchandising.  If past animated films are any indication Dorothy of Oz has the potential to generate toy and merchandise revenues many multiples larger than its box office sales.

For example, five years after the 2006 release of Disney’s Cars, the movie had grossed $462 million at the box office.  But it had generated $8 billion in retail merchandise sales—seventeen times the amount it earned in ticket sales—and this was before interest in the franchise was rekindled by the sequel, Cars 2. New merchandise sales put the total well in excess of $10 billion…and counting.

Given the number of Lightning McQueen and Mater toys rolling around my house and the closet full of Cars-themed shirts and jackets in my three-year-old son’s room, I feel as though I have spent that much singlehandedly.  And most American parents and grandparents feel my pain.  (We didn’t stop with Cars, by the way. After Cars, my son discovered Toy Story.  We now own at least four Buzz Lightyear action figures, among many, many others…)

The Cars franchise was wildly successful, and not every animated movie can be expected to generate those kinds of returns.  As a case in point, consider the 2007 hit Ratatouille.  Though it was popular at the box office, kids weren’t exactly lining up to buy rat dolls after watching it.

Still, The Wizard of Oz is not Ratatouille. Including its original books, it’s been an American cultural icon for over a century, and its characters are highly marketable.  Dorothy stands to profit handsomely from this.  You don’t need to look behind the curtain to see the potential for a boom in all things Oz.

Note: To watch a preview of the movie and to get an early look at the virtual world planned, go to dorothyofoz.com.

SUBSCRIBE to Sizemore Insights via e-mail today.

 

Comments { 4 }

What Happens if Hugo Chavez Croaks?

It may sound like a harsh question.  But the man is seriously ill with cancer, and he has had no public appearances in over a month. Rumors abound that he is near death…or may already be dead.   As he is reported to be in Havana, some have even speculated that the Cuban government is essentially holding him hostage to secure its own future.

Love him or hate him, the authoritarian Venezuelan president has quite a few mouths to feed across Latin America, and his death could send shockwaves across the region.  Let’s take a look at who is most likely to be affected…and what it might mean for the financial markets.

At the top of the list is the Castro regime in Cuba.  Cuba gets about two-thirds of its oil from Venezuela, and most is either given to the island free or via loans that everyone involved knows will never be repaid.  By Wall Street Journal estimates, Venezuela accounts for 40% of Cuba’s overall trade…and Venezuelan aid and trade is worth about 22% of Cuba’s entire economy.

For all intents and purposes, Chavez is the patrón of Cuba, and the Castro regime continues to exist at his pleasure.  And if Chavez dies, his radical movement will probably die with him, or at the very least it will be significantly weaker without his cult of personality.

Without Chavez’s patronage, Cuba will have to seek a lifeline elsewhere…which means it will likely have to open its economy further to foreign investment.  Perhaps the best way to get exposure to an investment boom in Cuba and its neighbors would be via the shares of the Herzfeld Caribbean Basin Fund (Nasdaq:$CUBA).

It is by no means a pure play on Cuba (remember, we’re talking about a communist country here…), but it is a nice collection of companies in the tourism, banking, and consumer products companies of the Caribbean and Latin American regions that should benefit from Cuban liberalization.

The Castro brothers are not the only radical regime at risk from the demise of Chavez.  Bolivia and Nicaragua both depend on Venezuelan generosity, and Syria and Iran have benefitted from political and diplomatic support.  None of these are really investable themes, however, and it’s probably better that way.

One major question mark is the price of crude oil (NYSE:$USO).  Venezuela has the largest oil reserves in the world—yes, even larger than Russia or Saudi Arabia—yet its annual production places it in 11th place globally.  Venezuelan crude oil production has been in steady decline since Chavez took power and for obvious reasons.  Professional managers were replaced with political hatchet men, and no foreign investor in their right mind would invest in the country even if Chavez allowed them.

The death of Chavez and the fall of his regime would likely mean massive foreign investment in the Venezuelan oil industry and could lead to a surge of new production…which would be incredibly bearish for the price of oil.

Alas, all of this is premature.  Chavez is still alive—as far as we know—and his death will not automatically bring free trade, peace, and prosperity to his country.  A far more likely outcome will be years of political infighting and…in the worst case…civil war.

In the meantime, all eyes are on Havana.

SUBSCRIBE to Sizemore Insights via e-mail today. This article first appeared on InvestorPlace.

Comments { 3 }

He’s Back: What Silvio Berlusconi Means For Italy and the Euro Crisis

Part of me really missed the guy.  There was something naturally endearing about Silvio Berlusconi.

Perhaps it was his ability to charm women 50 years his junior or his complete disregard for the conflicts of interest involved with being your country’s national leader and one of its richest men and the owner of its most influential media group.  Or maybe it was his willingness to change the laws of his country on a regular basis to protect himself from criminal prosecution or the fact that he ruled Italy—the third most powerful country in continental Europe—like a mafia don.  Through it all, naughty ol’ Silvio seemed to prove that, with a few winks and nods, a ton of money and a total lack of shame or scruples, a guy really could have everything he wanted in life.

On a serious note, I was not happy to see Mr. Berlusconi reappear on the political stage. It is a potential disaster for Italy, the Eurozone, and investors around the world.

Berlusconi’s party withdrew its support for Italy’s technocratic prime minister Mario Monti—the one political figure in Italy that both the international bond market and the other leaders of Europe took seriously—prompting Monti to turn in his resignation over the weekend.

Not surprisingly, Italian stocks sold off Monday morning — the iShares MSCI Italy Index (NYSE:$EWI) had lost more than 3% before recovering slightly by midday — the euro fell, and Italian bond yields shot up.  And across the Mediterranean, Spanish stocks fell, and Spanish bond yields rose.

The market is not happy about Silvio Berlusconi’s return.  The fragile peace we’ve had for much of the past year has been due to a belief that we finally had an adult running Italy.  Bond yields had been steadily dropping as a sign of confidence in Mario Monti and his austerity reforms.  An Italy without Monti is the same dysfunctional Italy that ran up debts of 120% of GDP while showing no real GDP growth in over a decade…proverbially fiddling while Rome burned.

Berlusconi will not win the upcoming election.  His party is a tattered mess, and most Italians are sick of the man.  And Mario Monti may yet stage a comeback, either as the head of a centrist movement or as a finance minister in a center-left government headed by Pier Luigi Bersani.

But Berlusconi’s presence is enough of a distraction to have the markets worried.  My fear is that he rattles the bond market out of its complacency and creates another self-reinforcing cycle of loss of confidence leading to higher yields and vice versa.

It’s too early for me to recommend dumping European stocks just yet.  Thus far, the market seems to have confidence in ECB President Mario Draghi’s ability to keep the entire dog and pony show together with creative monetary policy, and Europe’s leaders are slowly muddling through to a political solution to the debt crisis.  But given the ability of investor sentiment to turn on a dime, I would recommend tightening stop losses.  Or at least start keeping a closer eye on your European stock holdings.

SUBSCRIBE to Sizemore Insights via e-mail today.

This article first appeared on InvestorPlace.

Comments { 7 }

This material is provided for informational purposes only, as of the date hereof, and is subject to change without notice. This material may not be suitable for all investors and is not intended to be an offer, or the solicitation of any offer, to buy or sell any securities.